Kulchur Klash 2002:
Part 1.
The Church
By
C. E. Carlson
INTRODUCTION:
A church service or Sunday morning TV evangelist sermon is usually not complete
without words to the effect that "our
society is crumbling." I heard these exact words preached only last
Sunday. One who mulls this over might ask the question, “How can a Christian country like ours have a
crumbing society…Ought this
not be an oxymoron?”
Most other nations have long viewed
A third possibility (the true one) is that our society appears to one of Christ
followers but is not; the abundance of churches, the enormous TV Christian
budgets, and even the attendance itself are signs not of holiness but of
affluence and boredom. If this is true, then the pastor at the pulpit may be
right, our society may indeed be crumbling.
A hallmark of Christ's teachings is a call to love all men, not simply those
one agrees with, and to seek peace with that love even at a cost…even to place
peace before affluence. Any who deny this, deny most
of what Christ said. That includes those who claim to follow Him from the lofty
heights of federal government and the cockpits of war machines. Those who call
themselves by Christ's name, yet doubt what you have just read, are invited to
read the book of Matthew, especially the 5th chapter, before reading one more
line of this essay. The Bible, Genesis Network.
In spite of our leaders’ professions and oft-stated suggestions in word and
innuendo, our government is now undeniably engaged in almost continuous
aggressive violence which has lately become referred to as undeclared wars. Few reasonable persons will deny
that the result is and will be accelerating dollar costs (inflation) at home
and death and destruction to others delicately referred to as collateral damage. Nonetheless, dozens
of statements from many popular Christian leaders indicate that they support,
virtually without objection, the administration's stated plan to continue the
An observer from outer space might well ask, "If America is indeed a
Christian nation, then doesn't this make Christianity a religion of crusades
and wars?" If Christianity is not a religion of war, what are popular
American Christians doing to prevent and ameliorate the serial wars damage to
less fortunate persons who are clearly victims of the American unmatched and
unlimited destructive power, and what about the psychological damage to those
asked to push the buttons on mass assassination? The answer is, far from helping, most professing Christian leaders are throwing gas
on the fire. We must first ask, who within the ranks of those who call
themselves Christians are responsible for promoting war, and why do they do it?
The Biblical and secular accounts of Jesus arrest, persecution, trial and
execution attest to the power of the Pharisee sect today now know as Judaism.
It is noted here that
Part I: Are Pharisees Extinct?
The Pharisees Jesus denounced have not
gone away, but have established an even more formidable control mechanism in
our society than ever existed in Christ's mortal lifetime. Some are Christian
Pharisees and some are Jewish. First, let us define them. The noun Pharisee occurs, according to Strongs'
Concordance, 78 times in the New Testament, much more frequently than
"Satan." Yet usage of the word has been largely eliminated from
teaching in many Bibles studies, the pulpits of
Webster Defines Pharisee: "One of
the members of a school or party among the ancient Jews noted for the strict
formal observance of the rites and validity of traditions of the elders."
Further on: "Pharisee interpretation
provided the standard of observation and belief for the great majority of the
Jews from the 1st Century A.D."
Pharisaic: "Hypocritical, self righteous and censorious of others" --
Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Edition,
1950.
Webster's all but forgotten definition is
an accurate one. Pharisees were in conflict with Jesus whenever they met.
Followers of Christ confronted the Pharisees repeatedly. It was a Jewish sect that followed the "traditions of the elders" as
Webster stated and as Jesus also said. These traditions are now known as the Talmud. But what the 1950 dictionary did
not recognize is that Pharisaism was even then no longer exclusively Jewish, as
it once may have been, for Pharisaic influence long before the 1950s could
probably have been found in every denomination in
All mention of the Pharisaism occurs in the New Testament where it formed the
center of conflict around Jesus, His disciples, and His followers. As Jesus
predicted many were stalked, scourged and killed by the Pharisees. In addition
to the 78 verses in which Pharisee are mentioned by name, pronouns including you point to Pharisees in many
additional verses. The Pharisees are the object of Jesus' debate and
denunciation in entire chapters in Matthew, Luke and John as well as the
writings of Paul who claimed he once had been a Pharisee, having killed
Christians. These many references provide an undeniable account of the ongoing
conflict and plot against Jesus' life for all who read. The noun Pharisee
occurs about three times more often than the infamous name of Judas, 30 times
more than Satan and 50 more times than the name of Pontius Pilate. It is,
without a doubt, the most denounced noun in the New Testament. It is the only
name that Jesus constantly associated with the Satan.
Jesus followers feared the political power of the Pharisees more than the
Romans. Yet the word Pharisee is pointedly ignored by most Christian leaders
and all but forgotten in modern evangelical Christendom and the ranks of the
celebrity media broadcasters. Pharisee
may also be the most avoided word found in the Bible. Some pastors and most
televangelists are capable of preaching the year through without ever
mentioning Pharisee, except in passing by on the way to some other point.
Pharisees are wrongly treated as an extinct and irrelevant species.
Organized Bible study courses rarely mention whom the Pharisees were, why Jesus
pronounced upon them so harshly, and never treated the Pharisee as an
anti-Christ type to watch out for in our day. Celebrity Christians on national
TV never suggest that the Pharisees’ war on Jesus has anything at all to do
with His followers, or that the sect may have survived to this day.
Censorship in The
Church
The word Pharisee has not yet been removed from any Bibles we know of, but most
Bible commentaries and concordances avoid any serious treatment of how they
operate to control civil government, and who their successors are today. For
instance, the concordance in the new Thompson Study Bible, a very popular one
that is supposedly designed to help readers understand the scriptures, has all
but eliminated any mention of this sect. Amazingly, Thompson new edition
concordance lists only one of the 78 sites, yet its previous 1962 edition
listed four. Pray tell, what happened to the other three verses it previously
recognized, not to mention 74 never cited at all? The four references cited are
atypically favorable having to do with Paul's own Pharisaic history. It appears
the publisher is whitewashing the word and deleting Pharisee from its readers' vocabularies. This is unthinkable
because Jesus denounced the Pharisees, the most powerful and destructive
faction of anti-Christianity calling them a "generation of vipers" and "sons of Satan." But most study Bibles and Bible courses omit
all but casual mention of Pharisees. Curiously, the much-maligned paraphrase
Living Bible Concordance contains the key sites found in Strongs, and is well
worth reading.
Today’s Pharisees
Let us examine what has become of the Pharisees in
our modern society and how they continue to attempt to control our lives. The
New Testament tells us they controlled
The venerable traditionally Christian Webster is not the only one to say this?
Proper definitions are taken from correct and proper usage of that less
censored age. Many Rabbis have proudly provided the rabbinical sources for
Webster's definition. The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, states: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces it
descent without a break from the Pharisees- their ideas and methods are found
in the Talmud." And Rabbi Louise Finklestein, head of the Jewish
Theological Seminary, stated in his book, History of the Jews, 1949,"Pharisaism became Talmudist...the spirit of
the ancient Pharisees survived unaltered ...therefore any discourse regarding
the Jewish religion must be based on Talmudism." Jewish leaders were
in the 1950s obviously were proud of their claim to be Pharisees.
This is not to suggest that all Jews to be Pharisees any more than all
Pharisees are Jews. But Pharisees dominated religious thinking in Jesus’ time
and have far too much to say about what the leaders of our government do. Much
worse, they have established influence over what Christians think. Pharisaic
Judaism attempted but failed to censor Christian thought in the first century;
today, they are succeeding. This is indeed a sad reflection on popular
Christian leadership.
The Pharisee Bible
The Pharisees of today have moved heaven and earth to discourage thousands of
pastors and televangelists from teaching what Jesus said so clearly. The
godfather of the Biblical censors is the powerfully promoted Scofield Study
Bible, first printed in
The latest, much changed edition of Scofield Study Bible was printed in 1962
and boldly elevated anti-Semitism to
the status of a "sin," a
sort of 11th Commandment, it would seem. Each of the four successive editions,
beginning in 1908, have further advanced the claims of the self-proclaimed Jews
to the real estate known today as the State of Israel, a nation which did not
even exist when its first three editions were published. The latest, 1962
Edition goes so far as to contains a note stating that "For A Nation To Commit The Sin Of
Anti-Semitism Brings Inevitable Judgment" (page 20) But it contains
hardly a note interpreting any of the hundreds of verses Jesus spoke in his
daily conflict with the Pharisees and their plot for his death. Scofield
ignores all, giving the reader the impression these are of little consequence;
and since the King James Version is slow reading at best, readers tend to rely
on the notes. Most study Bibles we have seen, including the Thompson, follow
Scofield's Pharisee-friendly example. These footnotes of men are a corruption
of the Bible of God, as it stated in its last book.
The first of the 78 mentions of Pharisees occurs in Matthew 3:7-8 when they
appear in numbers at the
One early exchange between Christ and the Pharisees occurred in Matthew 12
where Jesus called them: "An evil
and adulterous generation" in a powerful exchange that fills most of
the chapter12, and most of the long chapter of Matthew 23 is Jesus'
condemnation of the Pharisees, a small part of which states: "Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves,
that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye
generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore,
behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them
ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city." (Mt. 23:31-34)
Promoters of Israeli Pharisaism
Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jack Van Empe and dozens more like them have made
careers by promoting
Pharisees were once exclusively Judean, "Jews" in the vernacular of
our day. Many contend that Israeli Patriots assert more control over
Suggested background reading:
"The Body Snatchers'
Report On Planet Earth," our cultural problem, as viewed by and
intelligent visitor from space.
"SHERRY'S WAR,"
Why many professing Christians support war against Islam, political repression
and torture by
The
Bible, Genesis Network: We suggest every skeptical reader look up and read
each of the 78 references to Pharisee.
WHTT Act-Tank Recommendation: If you agree with us, help us give every
follower an opportunity to read this Pharisee Watch, and ask your own
pastor to preach and teach on what Jesus said about Pharisees.